Case v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.

69 Ohio St. 3d 1483

Opinion

Sandusky County, No. S-90-24. Reported at 69 Ohio St.3d 265, 631 N.E.2d 612. On motion for reconsideration by Mark A Robinson, Administrator, and on motion for reconsideration by Jesse L. Case. Motions granted and this cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Carpenter v. Consol Rail Corp. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 259, 631 N.E.2d 607.

Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., not participating.