Cartier v. Image 75

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2007·No. 07-1340·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1340

VERONICA CARTIER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

IMAGE 75, a/k/a Life Style Lift Clinic; SUZANNE KIM DOUD GALLI, M.D.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00294-LMB)

Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Veronica Cartier, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Veronica Cartier appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) with

prejudice for failure to state a claim, and dismissing her

remaining claims without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

1367(c)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Cartier v. Image 75, No. 1:07-cv-00294-LMB (E.D.

Va. Apr. 6, 2007). We further affirm the district court’s order

denying Cartier’s Notice of Removal of Material filed for the

reasons stated by the district court. Cartier v. Image 75, No.

1:07-cv-00294-LMB (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cartier v. Image 75, (4th Cir. 2007).

Cartier v. Image 75 (Cartier v. Image 75) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related