Cartier v. Image 75
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1340
VERONICA CARTIER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
IMAGE 75, a/k/a Life Style Lift Clinic; SUZANNE KIM DOUD GALLI, M.D.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00294-LMB)
Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Veronica Cartier, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Veronica Cartier appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) with
prejudice for failure to state a claim, and dismissing her
remaining claims without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
1367(c)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Cartier v. Image 75, No. 1:07-cv-00294-LMB (E.D.
Va. Apr. 6, 2007). We further affirm the district court’s order
denying Cartier’s Notice of Removal of Material filed for the
reasons stated by the district court. Cartier v. Image 75, No.
1:07-cv-00294-LMB (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cartier v. Image 75 (Cartier v. Image 75) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.