Cartier v. Image 75

235 F. App'x 73
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2007·No. No. 07-1340·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Veronica Cartier appeals the district court’s order dismissing her claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) with prejudice for failure to state a claim, and dismissing her remaining claims without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cartier v. Image 75, No. 1:07-cv-00294-LMB (E.D.Va. Apr. 6, 2007). We further affirm the district court’s order denying Cartier’s Notice of Removal of Material filed for the reasons stated by the district court. Cartier v. Image 75, No. 1:07-cv-00294-LMB (E.D.Va. Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cartier v. Image 75, 235 F. App'x 73 (4th Cir. 2007).

235 F. App'x 73 (Cartier v. Image 75) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related