Carteret Savings Bank v. Durham

568 So. 2d 1306, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8150
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 1990·No. No. 89-1385·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of dismissal. In essence the trial court held that the pleadings did not set out a legal relationship between the parties that gave rise to a duty on the part of the appellee to the appellant. Upon exhaustive briefing and thorough review of the allegations in the pleadings, we agree with this assessment by the trial court. Cf. Beach Point Condominium Association, Inc. v. Beach Point Corporation, 480 So.2d 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD and GUNTHER, JJ., and FRANK (RICHARD, H.), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carteret Savings Bank v. Durham, 568 So. 2d 1306, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8150 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

568 So. 2d 1306 (Carteret Savings Bank v. Durham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beach Point Condominium v. Beach Point
480 So. 2d 239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)