Carteret Savings Bank v. Durham

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carteret Savings Bank v. Durham

567 So. 2d 1078, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7995, 1990 WL 155067

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 17, 1990·No. No. 89-1644·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of dismissal. In essence the trial court held that the pleadings did not set out a legal relationship between the parties that gave rise to a duty on the part of the appellee to the appellant. Upon exhaustive briefing and thorough review of the allegations in the pleadings, we agree with this assessment by the trial court. Cf. Beach Point Condominium Association, Inc. v. Beach Point Corporation, 480 So.2d 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD and GUNTHER, JJ., and FRANK, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of dismissal. In essence the trial court held that the pleadings did not set out a legal relationship between the parties that gave rise to a duty on the part of the appellee to the appellant. Upon exhaustive briefing and thorough review of the allegations in the pleadings, we agree with this assessment by the trial court. Cf. Beach Point Condominium Association, Inc. v. Beach Point Corporation, 480 So.2d 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD and GUNTHER, JJ., and FRANK, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur.

Carteret Savings Bank v. Durham, 567 So. 2d 1078, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7995, 1990 WL 155067 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

567 So. 2d 1078 (Carteret Savings Bank v. Durham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related