Carter v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carter v. State

62 S.W.3d 430, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1336, 2001 WL 880162

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 247 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 7, 2001·No. No. WD 59184·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Carter appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Carter sought to vacate his convictions for sale of a controlled substance, section 195.211, RSMo 2000, and sale of a controlled substance near schools, section 195.214, RSMo 2000, and sentences to two concurrent terms of ten years imprisonment. He claims that his guilty plea was not voluntary because trial counsel misled him into believing that he would receive probation if he pleaded guilty. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Carter appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Carter sought to vacate his convictions for sale of a controlled substance, section 195.211, RSMo 2000, and sale of a controlled substance near schools, section 195.214, RSMo 2000, and sentences to two concurrent terms of ten years imprisonment. He claims that his guilty plea was not voluntary because trial counsel misled him into believing that he would receive probation if he pleaded guilty. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Carter v. State, 62 S.W.3d 430, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1336, 2001 WL 880162 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

62 S.W.3d 430 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.