Carter v. State
24 S.W.3d 214, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 661, 2000 WL 557002
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 372 →
Opinion
ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and re[215]*215stating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carter v. State, 24 S.W.3d 214, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 661, 2000 WL 557002 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).
24 S.W.3d 214 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.