Carter v. State

598 So. 2d 1082, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6616, 1992 WL 123463
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 571 So. 2d 520
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 10, 1992·No. No. 91-1845·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. We reject each of the arguments raised by appellant concerning the constitutionality of section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1991), including his argument that the amendments contained in chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, violate the single subject rule. See Wright v. State, 579 So.2d 418 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

Appellant correctly points out that the order of judgment incorrectly states that he was convicted of armed robbery. Therefore, we remand this cause to the trial court with directions to correct the order of judgment to reflect that he was convicted of robbery.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

HERSEY, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. State, 598 So. 2d 1082, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6616, 1992 WL 123463 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

598 So. 2d 1082 (Carter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. State
579 So. 2d 418 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)