Carter v. State
This text of 573 So. 2d 426 (Carter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eddie CARTER and Frank E. Johnson, Appellants,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellants.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James N. Charles, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
*427 COBB, Judge.
We affirm the convictions of the appellants, Eddie Carter and Frank Johnson, for three counts of sexual battery and kidnapping. We reverse the sentence imposed on Carter because victim injury points were assessed on his sentencing guidelines scoresheet for each of three sexual batteries committed against one victim during one criminal episode, contrary to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701 d.7. (1988), which limited such scoring to "each victim," not to each count. See Weekley v. State, 553 So.2d 239 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
Both convictions, and the sentence of Johnson, are affirmed. The sentence of the appellant Carter is reversed and remanded for resentencing.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
DAUKSCH and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
573 So. 2d 426, 1991 WL 8419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.