Carter v. New Orleans Fire Department

650 So. 2d 238, 1995 La. LEXIS 618, 1995 WL 71468
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 17, 1995
DocketNo. 94-C-3072
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 650 So. 2d 238 (Carter v. New Orleans Fire Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carter v. New Orleans Fire Department, 650 So. 2d 238, 1995 La. LEXIS 618, 1995 WL 71468 (La. 1995).

Opinion

IrPER CURIAM.

Plaintiff was employed as a fireman for over twenty years and suffered numerous work-related back injuries. In December of 1991, plaintiff was again injured when he fell at the scene of a fire. The City initially paid temporary total disability benefits, but terminated benefits after six months based on the belief that plaintiffs back condition was caused by degenerative disc disease rather than a work-related injury.

Plaintiff filed a claim with the Office of Worker’s Compensation, and the hearing officer awarded him supplemental earning benefits (SEBs) and medical expenses, as well as attorney’s fees, penalties, legal interest, and costs. On appeal, the court of appeal sub[239]*239stantially affirmed the hearing officer, but because plaintiff had “retired” from the fire department on a disability pension, the court held he is entitled to collect SEBs for only 104 weeks pursuant to La.Rev.Stat. 23:1221(3)(d)(iii), which provides:

(d) The right to supplemental earnings benefits pursuant to this Paragraph shall in no event exceed a maximum of five hundred twenty weeks, but shall terminate:
(iii) When the employee retires or begins to receive old age insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, whichever comes first; however, the period during which supplemental earnings 12benefits may be payable shall not be less than one hundred four weeks.

In Allen v. City of Shreveport, 637 So.2d 123, (La.1994), this court held that an injured worker is “retired” under Section 1221(3)(d)(iii) when the worker either withdraws permanently from the work force. In the present ease, the Office of Worker’s Compensation made no finding as to the retirement issue, and apparently the issue was not litigated in the proceeding that took place prior to the Allen decision. It is therefore appropriate to afford both sides the opportunity to present evidence on the issue of whether plaintiff has permanently withdrawn from the work force.

Accordingly, the application is granted, and the case is remanded to the Office of Worker’s Compensation for further proceedings to determine whether plaintiff has “retired” as defined in Allen, and whether the proper limitation on plaintiffs SEB benefits is 104 or 520 weeks.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miley v. Bogalusa Fire Department
166 So. 3d 319 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)
Pfister v. City of New Orleans
681 So. 2d 426 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
650 So. 2d 238, 1995 La. LEXIS 618, 1995 WL 71468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-new-orleans-fire-department-la-1995.