Carter v. Martin

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carter v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 F. App'x 681
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2002·No. 02-6795·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6795

TRACY LAMAR CARTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SAWYER MARTIN, Officer, Aiken Department of Public Safety; MIKE HUNT, Investigator, Aiken Department of Public Safety; RAYMOND O. SCOTT, Aiken Department of Public Safety,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-02-1058-1-22BD)

Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 25, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tracy Lamar Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Tracy Lamar Carter appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Carter v. Martin, No. CA-02-1058-1-22BD (D.S.C. filed May 8, 2002;

entered May 10, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. Martin, (4th Cir. 2002).

Carter v. Martin (Carter v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related