Carter v. Martin
This text of Carter v. Martin (Carter v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6795
TRACY LAMAR CARTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SAWYER MARTIN, Officer, Aiken Department of Public Safety; MIKE HUNT, Investigator, Aiken Department of Public Safety; RAYMOND O. SCOTT, Aiken Department of Public Safety,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-02-1058-1-22BD)
Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 25, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tracy Lamar Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Tracy Lamar Carter appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Carter v. Martin, No. CA-02-1058-1-22BD (D.S.C. filed May 8, 2002;
entered May 10, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carter v. Martin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-martin-ca4-2002.