Carter v. Martin

Fourth Circuit

Carter v. Martin

41 F. App'x 681

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2002·No. No. 02-6795·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tracy Lamar Carter appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Carter v. Martin, No. CA-02-1058-1-22BD (D.S.C. filed May 8, 2002; entered May 10, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Tracy Lamar Carter appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Carter v. Martin, No. CA-02-1058-1-22BD (D.S.C. filed May 8, 2002; entered May 10, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Carter v. Martin, 41 F. App'x 681 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

41 F. App'x 681 (Carter v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related