Carter v. Durkan

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided April 22, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-00123·Unknown

Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON JOSEPH CARTER, CASE NO. C20-0123-JCC Plaintiff, ORDER v. JENNY DURKAN et al., Defendant.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 13). Defendants filed their motion on March 20, 2020. Plaintiff has failed to respond to Defendant’s motion. If a plaintiff fails to respond to a defendant’s motion to dismiss, then a district court may dismiss the case without reaching the merits. See W.D. Wash. Local Civ. R. 7(b)(2); Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53–54 (9th Cir. 1995); Marcus v. ABC Signature Studios, Inc., 279 F. Supp. 3d 1056, 1063 (C.D. Cal. 2017). The Court finds that approach appropriate here. Consequently, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. // // // // DATED this 22nd day of April 2020. A John C. Coughenour UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. Durkan, (W.D. Wash. 2020).

Carter v. Durkan (Carter v. Durkan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hastings v. United States
279 F. Supp. 13 (N.D. California, 1967)