Carter v. Derwinski
This text of 970 F.2d 662 (Carter v. Derwinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dale L. CARTER; David A. Johnson; Fred Emery; James R.
Straw, on behalf of all in the State of Idaho
similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Edward J. DERWINSKI, Secretary, of the Department of
Veterans Affairs, or his successor, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-35530.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
July 30, 1992.
Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
970 F.2d 662, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6605, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-derwinski-ca9-1992.