Carter v. Cole

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Carter v. Cole

539 N.W.2d 241, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 943, 1995 WL 643922

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 25, 1995

DocketC0-94-1580

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 539 N.W.2d 241 (Carter v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carter v. Cole, 539 N.W.2d 241, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 943, 1995 WL 643922 (Mich. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, in light of the reasoning of Johnson v. Jones, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2151, 132 L.Ed.2d 238 (1995), the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

We do not here consider or determine the appealability of an order denying summary judgment where the genuine issues of material fact identified by the trial court are related to the issue of immunity, and not to the merits of the claim. See Baker v. Chaplin, 517 N.W.2d 911, 916 (Minn.1994).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, in light of the reasoning of Johnson v. Jones, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2151, 132 L.Ed.2d 238 (1995), the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

We do not here consider or determine the appealability of an order denying summary judgment where the genuine issues of material fact identified by the trial court are related to the issue of immunity, and not to the merits of the claim. See Baker v. Chaplin, 517 N.W.2d 911, 916 (Minn.1994).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 N.W.2d 241, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 943, 1995 WL 643922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-cole-minn-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack