Carter v. Cole

539 N.W.2d 241, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 943, 1995 WL 643922
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided October 25, 1995·No. C0-94-1580·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, in light of the reasoning of Johnson v. Jones, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2151, 132 L.Ed.2d 238 (1995), the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

We do not here consider or determine the appealability of an order denying summary judgment where the genuine issues of material fact identified by the trial court are related to the issue of immunity, and not to the merits of the claim. See Baker v. Chaplin, 517 N.W.2d 911, 916 (Minn.1994).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carter v. Cole, 539 N.W.2d 241, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 943, 1995 WL 643922 (Mich. 1995).

539 N.W.2d 241 (Carter v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gerber v. Neveaux
578 N.W.2d 399 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1998)
Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit Operations
563 N.W.2d 309 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1997)
Edina Education Ass'n v. Board of Education
562 N.W.2d 306 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1997)