Carter-Frost v. District of Columbia
This text of Carter-Frost v. District of Columbia (Carter-Frost v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) PAMELA CARTER-FROST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ) Civil Action No. 15-930 (EGS) ) Defendant. ) )
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum
Opinion it is hereby
ORDERED that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as
to the plaintiff’s gender discrimination claim is DENIED. Only
Ms. Carter-Frost’s gender discrimination regarding the
defendant’s decision to laterally transfer her to the Fifth
District for patrol work may proceed; and it is further
to plaintiff’s retaliation claim is GRANTED; and it is further
to the plaintiff’s hostile work environment claim is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: Emmet G. Sullivan United States District Judge April 9, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carter-Frost v. District of Columbia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-frost-v-district-of-columbia-dcd-2018.