Carrols Corp. v. State
This text of 185 A.D.2d 616 (Carrols Corp. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons stated by the Court of Claims (Israel Margolis, J.). We add only that the evidence was clear that the taking rendered the building largely unfit for a high-volume, fast-food restaurant, and "it would have been folly” for claimant to await the actual taking before constructing a new restaurant building (Conn Realty Corp. v State of New York, 44 AD2d 892; see, Wilmot v State of New York, 32 NY2d 164, 168-169, rearg denied 33 NY2d 657). (Appeal from Judgment of Court of Claims, Israel Margolis, J.—Appropriation.) Present—Den-man, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Fallon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 A.D.2d 616, 587 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrols-corp-v-state-nyappdiv-1992.