Carroll v. State
This text of 33 S.E. 841 (Carroll v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There was no error in overruling aground of amotion for new trial, based upon newly discovered evidence, when the sole and unsupported witness who made affidavit to such newly discovered facts was-successfully impeached by a number of witnesses, disproving the facts she testified to, testifying to statements made by her contradictory of the facts alleged in her affidavit, and showing that she was unworthy of any credit whatever, on account of general bad character. Keller v. State, 102 Ga. 507, 515; Atlanta Cons. St. Ry. Co. v. McIntire, 103 Ga. 568; O’Neil v. State, 104 Ga. 538.
2. There was sufficient evidence on the trial of the case to sustain the verdict of the jury finding the defendant guilty of murder.
Judgment affirmed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 S.E. 841, 108 Ga. 788, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-state-ga-1899.