Atlanta Consolidated Street Railway Co. v. McIntire
Opinion
1. Under the facts as disclosed by the record, there was no error in any ruling of the court; and in the light of the entire charge, there was no error in the charges complained of, or in the refusals to charge.
2. Where newly discovered evidence is insisted on as a ground for a new trial, and, from a counter-showing made, it appears that the evidence is conflicting as to the truth of the facts claimed to be newly discovered, [569]*569this court will not interfere with the discretion of the court below either in granting or refusing a new trial upon such ground.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
29 S.E. 766 (Atlanta Consolidated Street Railway Co. v. McIntire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.