Carroll v. State
226 So. 2d 265
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carroll v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7131 →
Opinion
Defendant’s sole point on appeal is that the state failed to lay a sufficient predicate for the introduction of his confession. We have carefully reviewed the record and find that this contention is entirely without merit.
Defendant was advised of his rights and understandingly waived them. He was not intimidated, coerced or induced to confess.
The state met its burden and we conclude the defendant’s confession was voluntarily given. See Williams v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 188 So.2d 320; Reddish v. State, Fla. 1964, 167 So.2d 858.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carroll v. State, 226 So. 2d 265 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
226 So. 2d 265 (Carroll v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reddish v. State
167 So. 2d 858 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)
Williams v. State
188 So. 2d 320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)