Carroll v. State
This text of 259 So. 2d 539 (Carroll v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants pled guilty to charges of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony. The trial court made extensive inquiries to ascertain that the guilty pleas were knowingly and voluntarily made, complying fully with the requirements of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274. Thereupon the trial judge accepted the pleas and entered judgments of conviction and imposed appropriate penalties.
Appellants were represented by the Public Defender before the trial court and on this appeal. By the brief filed herein on behalf of appellants by the Public Defender, we are advised that counsel has fully examined the record on appeal and is of the view that the requirements of Boykin, supra, have been fully complied with and that no error appears in this record.
We agree and affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 So. 2d 539, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-state-fladistctapp-1972.