Carroll v. Fort James Corp.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION
GERALD CARROLL, et al. § PLAINTIFFS § § v. § Civil No. 1:04cv3-HSO-JCG § § FORT JAMES CORPORATION § DEFENDANT
FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL This matter came on to be heard on Defendant’s Motion [154] for Summary Judgment. The Court, after a full review and consideration of the pleadings on file, the record as a whole, and relevant legal authority, finds that in accord with its Order entered this date and the Court’s prior Orders [34], [67],1 [124], [153], IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, this civil action is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 14th day of January, 2021. s/ Halil Suleyman Ozerden HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 See Carroll v. Fort James Corp., 470 F.3d 1171, 1174 (5th Cir. 2006) (affirming in part to the extent the Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ fraud claim).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carroll v. Fort James Corp. (Carroll v. Fort James Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.