Carroll v. City of Camden

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Carroll v. City of Camden

220 A.2d 111, 47 N.J. 238

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJune 6, 1966

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 220 A.2d 111 (Carroll v. City of Camden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carroll v. City of Camden, 220 A.2d 111, 47 N.J. 238 (N.J. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

47 N.J. 238 (1966) 220 A.2d 111

JOHN J. CARROLL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF CAMDEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, AND THE CAMDEN CITY PLANNING BOARD, A BODY CORPORATE, POLITIC AND A MUNICIPAL AGENCY, AND THE DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY OF PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW JERSEY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 23, 1966. Decided June 6, 1966.

Mr. Carlton W. Rowand argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Joseph M. Nardi, Jr. argued the cause for respondent City of Camden.

Mr. Mark H. Watson argued the cause for respondent The Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey (Mr. Thomas F. Connery, Jr., attorney).

Mr. Martin F. McKernan filed a statement on behalf of respondent The Housing Authority of the City of Camden.

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial constitutional question.

For dismissal Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO 6.

Opposed None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI