Carroll v. Burlington Industries
This text of 354 S.E.2d 237 (Carroll v. Burlington Industries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opal L. CARROLL
v.
BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES and
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and
American Motorists Insurance Company.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
*238 Frederick R. Stann, Gastonia, for plaintiff-appellant.
Hedrick, Eatman, Gardner & Kincheloe by J.A. Gardner, III, Charlotte, for defendants-appellees Burlington Industries and American Motorists Ins. Co.
Golding, Crews, Meekins & Gordon by Michael K. Gordon, Charlotte, for defendant-appellees Burlington Industries and Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
354 S.E.2d 237, 319 N.C. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-burlington-industries-nc-1987.