Carrigan-St. Clair v. Wildwood Preserve Farms, Inc.
This text of 2009 OK 89 (Carrigan-St. Clair v. Wildwood Preserve Farms, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
€ 1 The Court notes Appellant's application for appointment of a different judge on remand pursuant to 20 0.8.Supp.2008 § 95.10. Appellant's application for appointment of a district court judge on remand is hereby denied without prejudice to Appellant seeking relief upon remand in the District Court pursuant to Rule 15 of the Rules for District Courts, 12 0.8.2001 Ch. 2, App.
{2 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE.
T3 VOTE ON APPELLANT'S APPLICATION
ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.
[1199]*1199T4 VOTE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2009 OK 89, 228 P.3d 1198, 2009 Okla. LEXIS 101, 2009 WL 4263759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrigan-st-clair-v-wildwood-preserve-farms-inc-okla-2009.