Carrigan-St. Clair v. Wildwood Preserve Farms, Inc.

2009 OK 89, 228 P.3d 1198, 2009 Okla. LEXIS 101, 2009 WL 4263759
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 30, 2009
Docket106,454
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 2009 OK 89 (Carrigan-St. Clair v. Wildwood Preserve Farms, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carrigan-St. Clair v. Wildwood Preserve Farms, Inc., 2009 OK 89, 228 P.3d 1198, 2009 Okla. LEXIS 101, 2009 WL 4263759 (Okla. 2009).

Opinions

ORDER

€ 1 The Court notes Appellant's application for appointment of a different judge on remand pursuant to 20 0.8.Supp.2008 § 95.10. Appellant's application for appointment of a district court judge on remand is hereby denied without prejudice to Appellant seeking relief upon remand in the District Court pursuant to Rule 15 of the Rules for District Courts, 12 0.8.2001 Ch. 2, App.

{2 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE.

/s) James E. Edmondson CHIEF JUSTICE

T3 VOTE ON APPELLANT'S APPLICATION

ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.

[1199]*1199T4 VOTE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

TIGGES v. ANDREWS
2017 OK 9 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2017)
Choate v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp.
2016 OK CIV APP 60 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2015)
Harmon v. DAMET
2012 OK CIV APP 25 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2011)
Carrigan-St. Clair v. Wildwood Preserve Farms, Inc.
2009 OK 89 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2009 OK 89, 228 P.3d 1198, 2009 Okla. LEXIS 101, 2009 WL 4263759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrigan-st-clair-v-wildwood-preserve-farms-inc-okla-2009.