Carrigan-St. Clair v. Wildwood Preserve Farms, Inc.

2009 OK 89, 228 P.3d 1198, 2009 Okla. LEXIS 101, 2009 WL 4263759
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 30, 2009·No. 106,454·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

ORDER

€ 1 The Court notes Appellant's application for appointment of a different judge on remand pursuant to 20 0.8.Supp.2008 § 95.10. Appellant's application for appointment of a district court judge on remand is hereby denied without prejudice to Appellant seeking relief upon remand in the District Court pursuant to Rule 15 of the Rules for District Courts, 12 0.8.2001 Ch. 2, App.

{2 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE.

/s) James E. Edmondson CHIEF JUSTICE

T3 VOTE ON APPELLANT'S APPLICATION

ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.

[1199] T4 VOTE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION

ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carrigan-St. Clair v. Wildwood Preserve Farms, Inc., 2009 OK 89, 228 P.3d 1198, 2009 Okla. LEXIS 101, 2009 WL 4263759 (Okla. 2009).

2009 OK 89 (Carrigan-St. Clair v. Wildwood Preserve Farms, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TIGGES v. ANDREWS
2017 OK 9 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2017)
Choate v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp.
2016 OK CIV APP 60 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2015)
Harmon v. DAMET
2012 OK CIV APP 25 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2011)
Carrigan-St. Clair v. Wildwood Preserve Farms, Inc.
2009 OK 89 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2009)