Carrigan-St. Clair v. Wildwood Preserve Farms, Inc.
Opinions
ORDER
€ 1 The Court notes Appellant's application for appointment of a different judge on remand pursuant to 20 0.8.Supp.2008 § 95.10. Appellant's application for appointment of a district court judge on remand is hereby denied without prejudice to Appellant seeking relief upon remand in the District Court pursuant to Rule 15 of the Rules for District Courts, 12 0.8.2001 Ch. 2, App.
{2 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE.
T3 VOTE ON APPELLANT'S APPLICATION
ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.
[1199] T4 VOTE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION
ALL JUSTICES CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2009 OK 89 (Carrigan-St. Clair v. Wildwood Preserve Farms, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.