Carrasco v. Griffin

S.D. New York

Carrasco v. Griffin

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 31, 2021·No. 7:17-cv-09643·Unknown

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ENDORSEMENT Carrasco v. Griffin, 17 CV 9643 (VB) In the attached motion dated August 15, 2021, plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, renews his request for pro bono counsel and requests the Court appoint Brian Dratch as his counsel in this case. (Doc. #78). Plaintiffs request for pro bono counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court has considered the type and complexity of this case, the merits of plaintiff’s claims, and plaintiff's ability to present the case. The Court does not find any exceptional circumstances in plaintiffs case that would warrant the appointment of counsel at this time. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., Inc., 877 F.2d 170, 172 (2d Cir. 1989). Plaintiff may retain Mr. Dratch as his counsel if he wishes. If plaintiff retains counsel, counsel shall promptly file a notice of appearance on the docket. Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk shall terminate the motion. (Doc. #78). Dated: August 31, 2021 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED: Iu Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge

POCUR i SLECTR OMICALE ¥ Pypan □□ NW DOC yt ey | | oars Soy fryea |

con amp axe 4 Chambers of Vincent 7 “E63 QI 2

D) ECEIVE Gai rr Gute TT See exten sQre wi oO: i ee nee es WP □□□□ Se. SE □□ gee > NO \asam Bete nee Sete < □□ IN ARR Cn □□ 9.08 > nanote? 9 AB eo PSS! _

Lorena a) ms 2% OS. B\A\ SCL Lesars Vk □ Mn ered SwSPn a Dek kD ood fe Sie < J QOse Capt. Ton Sp SO ov ADs Set SaNeNS

en abies koa AN Speer dns a ke A WA ts) WA vs ocd Pn Meena mS ak □□ A NA 0 □□ mations R A □ Ko\S SA oS 250.6 AWA, 8 LAY Q RAS Soe

K_Sorno VV aesoks 2 a SLOT NZ Ants wake dQarnd Some Pawel. Gas \g Soe □□ □□ ko Lau \Woharn And Wietina dhomabvdcy. ths □□ hOUd. eS oe ees Sagal on Uae Cast UR Ruka GaCwRT Wit LO nc Sastinangyded Conca anos □□□□□ hand (Sn os ARAL Nom pes iT □□□□□□ On Ke □□ Poa

WS g__Xo._s9n dank

etal Bi Seiten DraliQ, oN SRanzlan Teel, Mamata is Shee Vie or Shar NesorRadkton,..

__ {Mood VS,2020 ey at . . . i □□□ « . = □

Sag. Carta yOGal __ a □

7 esis. 5 Sen, V2 NL

. □□□ . ‘

ecepanains “ “ii ~ 5 ener ere epee renee pei eenreintn litle 1 eee □□□□□

: : ‘ :

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM ENDORSEMENT Carrasco v. Griffin, 17 CV 9643 (VB) In the attached motion dated August 15, 2021, plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, renews his request for pro bono counsel and requests the Court appoint Brian Dratch as his counsel in this case. (Doc. #78). Plaintiffs request for pro bono counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court has considered the type and complexity of this case, the merits of plaintiff’s claims, and plaintiff's ability to present the case. The Court does not find any exceptional circumstances in plaintiffs case that would warrant the appointment of counsel at this time. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., Inc., 877 F.2d 170, 172 (2d Cir. 1989). Plaintiff may retain Mr. Dratch as his counsel if he wishes. If plaintiff retains counsel, counsel shall promptly file a notice of appearance on the docket. Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk shall terminate the motion. (Doc. #78). Dated: August 31, 2021 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED: Iu Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge