Carpenter v. Historical Society

1 Dem. Sur. 606
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carpenter v. Historical Society. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 Dem. Sur. 574
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided September 15, 1883·Published

Opinion

The Surrogate.

The bequest of the $100 to the Historical Society was for a pious use, and, therefore, it is immaterial whether the Society is a legal corporation or not, as, without being incorporated, it was competent to take for such a purpose (Potter v. Chapin, 6 Paige, 639; De Witt v. Chandler, 11 Abb. Pr., 459; Owens v. Missionary Soc., 14 N. Y., 380). Hence, the Society has a right to intervene and become a party to the probate proceeding as a legatee named in the codicil. It is unnecessary, therefore, to determine now the question discussed as to whether it is incorporated so as to be competent to take under the contingent devise contained in the codicil. The objection is, therefore, overruled.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carpenter v. Historical Society, 1 Dem. Sur. 606 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1883).

1 Dem. Sur. 606 (Carpenter v. Historical Society) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owens v. . the Missionary Society of the M.E. Church
14 N.Y. 380 (New York Court of Appeals, 1856)
De Witt v. Chandler
11 Abb. Pr. 459 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Potter v. Chapin
6 Paige Ch. 639 (New York Court of Chancery, 1837)