Carpenter v. Historical Society

1 Dem. Sur. 606
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1883
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Dem. Sur. 606 (Carpenter v. Historical Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carpenter v. Historical Society, 1 Dem. Sur. 606 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1883).

Opinion

The Surrogate.

The bequest of the $100 to the Historical Society was for a pious use, and, therefore, it is immaterial whether the Society is a legal corporation or not, as, without being incorporated, it was competent to take for such a purpose (Potter v. Chapin, 6 Paige, 639; De Witt v. Chandler, 11 Abb. Pr., 459; Owens v. Missionary Soc., 14 N. Y., 380). Hence, the Society has a right to intervene and become a party to the probate proceeding as a legatee named in the codicil. It is unnecessary, therefore, to determine now the question discussed as to whether it is incorporated so as to be competent to take under the contingent devise contained in the codicil. The objection is, therefore, overruled.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Owens v. . the Missionary Society of the M.E. Church
14 N.Y. 380 (New York Court of Appeals, 1856)
De Witt v. Chandler
11 Abb. Pr. 459 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Potter v. Chapin
6 Paige Ch. 639 (New York Court of Chancery, 1837)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Dem. Sur. 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carpenter-v-historical-society-nysurct-1883.