Carpenter v. Crane
1 Root 98
Opinion
Judgment- — -That the reply of the plaintiff is sufficient and for the plaintiff to recover; for that said note was given in the night season preceding the Sabbath, when there is no law [99] which expressly forbids it, or that declares such note to be void — and in this particular case, it appeared to be an interference to prevent the imprisonment of the brother.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carpenter v. Crane, 1 Root 98 (Colo. Ct. App. 1785).
1 Root 98 (Carpenter v. Crane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sibley v. Brown
21 Mass. 137 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1826)
Fox v. Abel
2 Conn. 541 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1818)