Carota v. Massapequa Union Free School District

272 A.D.2d 428, 708 N.Y.S.2d 340, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5592
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 428 (Carota v. Massapequa Union Free School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carota v. Massapequa Union Free School District, 272 A.D.2d 428, 708 N.Y.S.2d 340, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5592 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant, fourth and sixth-party plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated August 4, 1999, which denied its motion to vacate the 90-day notice of the sixth-party defendant and to extend the time to complete discovery, and granted the cross motion of the sixth-party defendant pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the sixth-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The grant of an extension of time pursuant to CPLR 2004 is addressed to the sound discretion of the court (see, Salzman & Salzman v Gardiner, 100 AD2d 846; Versatile Furniture Prods, v 32-8 Maujer Realty, 97 AD2d 463). The Supreme Court properly determined that the appellant failed to establish a reasonable excuse for its delay in prosecuting the sixth-party action. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the sixth-party complaint (see, Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co., 89 NY2d 499; Rada v City of Yonkers, 204 AD2d 523; Versatile Furniture Prods. v 32-8 Maujer Realty, supra). Santucci, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kim & Bae, P.C. v. Lee
2019 NY Slip Op 4924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Blay v. Frost
126 A.D.3d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Oliver v. Town of Hempstead
68 A.D.3d 1079 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Florestal v. Little Flower Children's Services
9 A.D.3d 348 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Acevedo v. DePena
6 A.D.3d 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Dhaliwal v. Long Boat Taxi, Inc.
305 A.D.2d 449 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
McCrory v. State
281 A.D.2d 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 428, 708 N.Y.S.2d 340, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carota-v-massapequa-union-free-school-district-nyappdiv-2000.