Acevedo v. DePena

6 A.D.3d 636, 775 N.Y.S.2d 181
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 2004·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated May 28, 2003, which denied their motion to extend the time to file a note of issue.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ second motion to extend the time to file a note of issue, given the delay of more than 2k years in conducting any further discovery and in properly filing a note of issue, an inadequate excuse for the delay, and prejudice to the defendants (see Dhaliwal v Long Boat Taxi, 305 AD2d 449 [2003]; Carota v Massapequa Union Free School Dist., 272 AD2d 428 [2000]). Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Acevedo v. DePena, 6 A.D.3d 636, 775 N.Y.S.2d 181 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

6 A.D.3d 636 (Acevedo v. DePena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hermida v. Harris
85 A.D.3d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Sanchez v. Serje
78 A.D.3d 1155 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Harrington v. Toback
34 A.D.3d 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Florestal v. Little Flower Children's Services
9 A.D.3d 348 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)