Carolina Mortgage Co. v. Long

174 S.E. 312, 206 N.C. 477, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 219
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 2, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Stacy, 0. J.,

after stating the case: Conceding, without deciding, that the judgment of voluntary nonsuit taken before the clerk was ineffectual, *478 because entered prior to receipt of opinion from this Court (Mfg. Co. v. Buxton, 105 N. C., 74, 11 S. E., 264, R. R. v. Sanford, 188 N. C., 218, 124 S. E., 308, Huntley v. Express Co., 191 N. C., 696, 132 S. E., 786, Bohannon v. Trust Co., 198 N. C., 702, 153 S. E., 263), still it would seem that plaintiffs counsel was entitled to notice of application for judgment on the certificate, so that nonsuit might then be entered before the judge, if the plaintiff so desired. Carpenter v. Hanes, 167 N. C., 551, 83 S. E., 577. This right will yet be accorded.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carolina Mortgage Co. v. Long, 174 S.E. 312, 206 N.C. 477, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 219 (N.C. 1934).

174 S.E. 312 (Carolina Mortgage Co. v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. Jones
158 S.E.2d 706 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
Casstevens v. Wilkes Telephone Membership Corp.
120 S.E.2d 94 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)