Bohannon v. Virginia Trust Co.

153 S.E. 263, 198 N.C. 702, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 455

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the ease: The order, here challenged, was improvidently entered because an appeal had been taken from the order removing the cause to Buncombe County for trial, and this stayed “all further proceedings in the court below upon the judgment appealed from, or upon the matters embraced therein.” C. S., 655; Pruett v. Power Co., 167 N. C., 598, 83 S. E., 830.

But for the order of removal, which was challenged by the appeal therefrom, the Superior Court of Buncombe County was without jurisdiction to hear the matter. Hence, the very question sought to be determined by the appeal from the order of removal was the right of the Superior Court of Catawba County to transfer the cause.to Buncombe County for trial. McRae v. Commissioners, 74 N. C., 415.

Nothing was said in Huntley v. Express Co., 191 N. C., 696, 132 S. E., 786, which militates against our present position, for the decision in that case was made to rest upon other statutes and other laws.

Again, judicial notice may be taken of the fact that Hon. Cameron E. MacRae is one of the special judges appointed by the Governor under authority of chapter 137, Public Laws 1929, and unless he had been duly commissioned to hold, and was holding, court in Buncombe County or the courts of the Nineteenth Judicial District at the time the judgment was signed, which purports to have been rendered “at Chambers,” he was also, for this reason, without authority to determine the matter. Greene v. Stadiem, 197 N. C., 472, 149 S. E., 685. The record is silent as to whether he held such commission, and we, therefore, omit any definite ruling on this ground.

Error.