Bohannon v. Virginia Trust Co.

198 N.C. 701
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 21, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating tbe case: This action is, in effect, one to redeem land from a mortgage or deed of trust, and necessarily calls for tbe determination, in some form, of tbe rights or interests of tbe parties therein. Tbe proper venue, therefore, is Buncombe County where tbe land is situated. C. S., 463. Tbe order of removal was correctly entered. Vaughan v. Fallin, 183 N. C., 318, 111 S. E., 513; Councill v. Bailey, 154 N. C., 54, 69 S. E., 760.

Causey v. Morris, 195 N. C., 532, 142 S. E., 783, strongly relied upon by tbe defendant, is not at variance with, but in support of, this position.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bohannon v. Virginia Trust Co., 198 N.C. 701 (N.C. 1930).

198 N.C. 701 (Bohannon v. Virginia Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rose's Stores, Inc. v. Tarrytown Center, Inc.
154 S.E.2d 320 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)