Carol M. Lawrence v. Curators of the University of Missouri
This text of 204 F.3d 807 (Carol M. Lawrence v. Curators of the University of Missouri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Carol M. Lawrence appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Curators of the University of Missouri (Curators) on Lawrence’s sex discrimination claim. Having reviewed the record, we conclude Lawrence is not entitled to relief. We agree with the district court’s analysis that there is no substantial evidence in the record tending to show the Curators’ decision for denying Lawrence’s application for promotion and tenure was a pretext for sex discrimination. We thus conclude the district court correctly granted summary judgment, and we affirm for the reasons stated in its ruling without further discussion. See 8th Cir.R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 F.3d 807, 2000 WL 193394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carol-m-lawrence-v-curators-of-the-university-of-missouri-ca8-2000.