Carney v. Hess

Eighth Circuit

Carney v. Hess

271 F. App'x 543

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedApril 3, 2008

DocketNo. 07-1577

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 271 F. App'x 543 (Carney v. Hess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carney v. Hess, 271 F. App'x 543 (8th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Carney appeals the district court’s¹ order granting defendants’ summary judgment motion in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Rouse v. Benson, 193 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir.1999), we conclude summary judgment in favor of defendants was proper. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David Carney appeals the district court’s¹ order granting defendants’ summary judgment motion in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Rouse v. Benson, 193 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir.1999), we conclude summary judgment in favor of defendants was proper. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 F. App'x 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carney-v-hess-ca8-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack