Carney v. Hess

Eighth Circuit

Carney v. Hess

271 F. App'x 543

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2008·No. No. 07-1577·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Carney appeals the district court’s¹ order granting defendants’ summary judgment motion in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Rouse v. Benson, 193 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir.1999), we conclude summary judgment in favor of defendants was proper. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

David Carney appeals the district court’s¹ order granting defendants’ summary judgment motion in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Rouse v. Benson, 193 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir.1999), we conclude summary judgment in favor of defendants was proper. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Carney v. Hess, 271 F. App'x 543 (8th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

271 F. App'x 543 (Carney v. Hess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related