Carlton 340622 v. Arizona Department of Corrections

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided June 12, 2020·No. 3:20-cv-08088·Unknown

Opinion

1 WO ASH 2 3 4 5 8 9 Paul Carlton, No. CV 20-08088-PCT-MTL (MHB) 10 Petitioner, 11 v. ORDER 12 Arizona Department of Corrections, et 13 al., 14 Respondents.

15 16 On April 14, 2020, Petitioner Paul Carlton, who is confined in the Arizona State 17 Prison Complex-Eyman, filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 2254 and, after being directed to do so, paid the filing fee. By Order dated May 19 18, 2020, the Court dismissed the Petition with leave to amend for lack of jurisdiction. 20 Petitioner was provided with 30 days in which to file an amended petition that cured the 21 deficiencies identified in the order. 22 On May 26, 2020, Petitioner filed an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 23 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 11). The Court will dismiss the Amended Petition 24 without prejudice and with leave to amend. 25 I. Amended Petition 26 Petitioner was convicted in Mohave County Superior Court, case #CR-2019-924, of 27 attempted molestation of a minor and sexual exploitation of a minor. In his Amended 28 Petition, Petitioner names the Arizona Department of Corrections Director David Shinn as 1 Respondent and the Arizona Attorney General as an Additional Respondent. Petitioner 2 raises one ground for relief. 3 II. Failure to Allege a Constitutional Violation 4 Section 2254(a), 28 U.S.C., requires the Court to “entertain an application for a writ 5 of habeas corpus [o]n behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State 6 court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws 7 or treaties of the United States.” (Emphasis added.) Absent from Petitioner’s ground for 8 relief is any statement that the Petitioner is in custody in violation of the Constitution or 9 the laws or treaties of the United States. Thus, the Court lacks jurisdiction over this case 10 and will dismiss it. 11 III. Leave to Amend 12 Within 30 days, Petitioner may submit a second amended petition to cure the 13 deficiency outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail Petitioner a court-approved form 14 to use for filing an amended petition. 15 If Petitioner files a second amended petition, he must use the court-approved form, 16 set forth each claim in a separate ground, and specifically allege in each ground the 17 particular federal constitutional right allegedly violated, with supporting facts. For 18 example, if Petitioner claims his due process rights are violated, he must also include the 19 federal rights violated, such as the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States 20 Constitution. Likewise, if Petitioner claims his right to effective assistance of counsel was 21 violated, he must also include the federal right violated, such as the Sixth Amendment of 22 the United States Constitution. 23 If Petitioner fails to file his second amended petition on the court-approved form 24 included with this Order, it will be stricken and the action dismissed without further notice 25 to Petitioner. 26 The second amended petition must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety on the 27 court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original Petition or Amended 28 1 Petition by reference. A second amended petition submitted by Petitioner should be clearly 2 designated as such on the face of the document. 3 A second amended petition supersedes the original petition and any prior amended 4 petitions. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. 5 Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the 6 original Petition and Amended Petition are treated as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 7 1262. Any ground for relief that was raised in the original Petition or Amended Petition 8 and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without prejudice is waived if it is not 9 alleged in the second amended petition. Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 10 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). 11 IV. Warnings 12 A. Address Changes 13 If Petitioner’s address changes, Petitioner must file and serve a notice of a change 14 of address in accordance with Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. 15 Petitioner must not include a motion for other relief with a notice of change of address. 16 Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action. 17 B. Possible Dismissal 18 If Petitioner fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including 19 these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 20 F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order 21 of the Court). 22 IT IS ORDERED: 23 (1) Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 11) is 24 dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date 25 this Order is filed to file an amended petition. 26 (2) The Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice of 27 this action, without further notice to Petitioner, if Petitioner fails to submit a second 28 amended petition on the court-approved form within 30 days from the filing date of this 1 Order and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. 2 (3) The Clerk of Court must send Petitioner the current court-approved form for filing a “Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State 4} Custody (Non-Death Penalty).” 5 Dated this 12th day of June, 2020. 6 WM clacl T. dh urgl Michael T. Liburdi 9 United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _4-

Instructions for Filing a Petition Under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

1. Who May Use This Form. To use this form, you must be a person who is currently serving a sentence under a judgment against you in a state court. You are asking for relief from the conviction or the sentence on the grounds that your conviction or sentence violates the United States Constitution or other federal law. You also may use this form to challenge a state judgment that imposed a sentence to be served in the future, but you must fill in the name of the state where the judgment was entered. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment. This form should not be used in death penalty cases. If you were sentenced to death, you are entitled to the assistance of counsel and you should request the appointment of counsel.

2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.5(a) provides that habeas corpus petitions must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages. The form, however, must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. You do not need to cite law. If you want to file a brief or arguments, you must attach a separate memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlton 340622 v. Arizona Department of Corrections, (D. Ariz. 2020).

Carlton 340622 v. Arizona Department of Corrections (Carlton 340622 v. Arizona Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related