Carlton 340622 v. Arizona Department of Corrections

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedMay 18, 2020
Docket3:20-cv-08088
StatusUnknown

This text of Carlton 340622 v. Arizona Department of Corrections (Carlton 340622 v. Arizona Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlton 340622 v. Arizona Department of Corrections, (D. Ariz. 2020).

Opinion

1 WO ASH 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Paul Carlton, No. CV 20-08088-PCT-MTL (MHB) 10 Petitioner, 11 v. ORDER 12 Arizona Department of Corrections, et 13 al., 14 Respondents.

15 16 Petitioner Paul Carlton, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison Complex- 17 Eyman, has filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 18 § 2254 (Doc. 1) and, after being directed to do so, has paid the filing fee. The Court will 19 dismiss the Petition without prejudice and with leave to amend. 20 I. Petition 21 Petitioner was convicted in Mohave County Superior Court, case #CR-2019-924, of 22 attempted molestation of a minor, and sexual exploitation of a minor. In his Petition, 23 Petitioner names the Arizona Department of Corrections as Respondent and the Arizona 24 Attorney General as an Additional Respondent. Petitioner raises one grounds for relief. 25 II. Failure to Allege a Constitutional Violation or Name Proper Respondent 26 Section 2254(a), 28 U.S.C., requires the Court to “entertain an application for a writ 27 of habeas corpus [o]n behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State 28 court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws 1 or treaties of the United States.” (Emphasis added.) Absent from Petitioner’s grounds 2 for relief is any statement that the Petitioner is in custody in violation of the Constitution 3 or the laws or treaties of the United States. 4 Further, a petitioner for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 must name the 5 state officer having custody of him as the respondent to the petition. See Rule 2(a), Rules 6 Governing Section 2254 Cases; Belgarde v. Montana, 123 F.3d 1210, 1212 (9th Cir. 1997). 7 Typically, this person is the warden of the institution where the petitioner is incarcerated. 8 When a habeas petitioner has failed to name a respondent who has the power to order the 9 petitioner’s release, the Court “may not grant effective relief, and thus should not hear the 10 case unless the petition is amended to name a respondent who can grant the desired relief.” 11 Smith v. Idaho, 392 F.3d 350, 355 n.3 (9th Cir. 2004). 12 Petitioner has named the Arizona Department of Corrections as Respondent. The 13 Arizona Department of Corrections, however, is not the proper respondent in a § 2254 14 habeas corpus petition. Thus, the Court lacks jurisdiction over this case and will dismiss 15 it. 16 III. Leave to Amend 17 For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner’s Petition will be dismissed with leave to 18 amend. Within 30 days, Petitioner may submit a first amended petition to cure the 19 deficiency outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail Petitioner a court-approved form 20 to use for filing an amended petition. 21 If Petitioner files an amended petition, he must use the court-approved form, set 22 forth each claim in a separate ground, and specifically allege in each ground the particular 23 federal constitutional right allegedly violated, with supporting facts. For example, if 24 Petitioner claims his due process rights are violated, he must also include the federal rights 25 violated, such as the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. 26 Likewise, if Petitioner claims his right to effective assistance of counsel was violated, he 27 must also include the federal right violated, such as the Sixth Amendment of the United 28 States Constitution. 1 If Petitioner fails to file his amended petition on the court-approved form included 2 with this Order, it will be stricken and the action dismissed without further notice to 3 Petitioner. 4 The amended petition must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety on the court- 5 approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original Petition by reference. Any 6 amended petition submitted by Petitioner should be clearly designated as such on the face 7 of the document. 8 An amended petition supersedes the original petition. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 9 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 10 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the original pleading is treated as 11 nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any ground for relief that was raised in the original 12 petition and that was voluntarily dismissed or was dismissed without prejudice is waived 13 if it is not alleged in an amended petition. Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 928 14 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). 15 IV. Warnings 16 A. Address Changes 17 If Petitioner’s address changes, Petitioner must file and serve a notice of a change 18 of address in accordance with Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. 19 Petitioner must not include a motion for other relief with a notice of change of address. 20 Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action. 21 B. Possible Dismissal 22 If Petitioner fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including 23 these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 24 F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order 25 of the Court). 26 IT IS ORDERED: 27 (1) Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is dismissed 28 without prejudice, with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date this Order 1 | is filed to file an amended petition. 2 (2) The Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice of this action, without further notice to Petitioner, if Petitioner fails to submit an amended 4 petition on the court-approved form within 30 days from the filing date of this Order and 5 | deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. 6 (3) | The Clerk of Court must send Petitioner the current court-approved form for filing a “Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State 8 | Custody (Non-Death Penalty).” 9 Dated this 18th day of May, 2020. 10 Wichak T. gihuade Michael T. Liburdi 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Instructions for Filing a Petition Under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

1. Who May Use This Form. To use this form, you must be a person who is currently serving a sentence under a judgment against you in a state court. You are asking for relief from the conviction or the sentence on the grounds that your conviction or sentence violates the United States Constitution or other federal law. You also may use this form to challenge a state judgment that imposed a sentence to be served in the future, but you must fill in the name of the state where the judgment was entered. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment. This form should not be used in death penalty cases. If you were sentenced to death, you are entitled to the assistance of counsel and you should request the appointment of counsel.

2. The Form.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramon L. Smith v. State of Idaho
392 F.3d 350 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Michael Lacey v. Joseph Arpaio
693 F.3d 896 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Belgarde v. Montana
123 F.3d 1210 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Carlton 340622 v. Arizona Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlton-340622-v-arizona-department-of-corrections-azd-2020.