Carlos Inoa v. Yvette Marte
This text of Carlos Inoa v. Yvette Marte (Carlos Inoa v. Yvette Marte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ August 17, 2016
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A16A1901. INOA v. MARTE.
On March 1, 2016, the trial court entered a permanent stalking protective order against Carlos Inoa. On March 29, 2016, pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) (1), Inoa filed a motion to set aside the judgment based on lack of personal jurisdiction. The trial court denied that motion on April 13, 2016, and on May 10, 2016, Inoa filed this direct appeal. However, under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8), an appeal from the denial of a motion to set aside a judgment requires the discretionary appeal procedures. Accordingly, this direct appeal must be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Anderson v. GGS Hotel Holdings, Georgia, Inc., 234 Ga. App. 284 (505 SE2d 572) (1998).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/17/2016 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carlos Inoa v. Yvette Marte, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlos-inoa-v-yvette-marte-gactapp-2016.