Carlos Bell v. Civil Service Commission
This text of Carlos Bell v. Civil Service Commission (Carlos Bell v. Civil Service Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 21, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano 161907 Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh CARLOS BELL and All Others Similarly Elizabeth M. Welch, Situated, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees, SC: 161907 v COA: 347929 Wayne CC: 17-003861-CZ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION and STATE PERSONNEL DIRECTOR, Defendants-Appellants. _______________________________________/
On order of the Court, by stipulation of the parties to withdraw the application for leave to appeal, the application is DISMISSED without costs and without prejudice to the defendants-appellants reinstating the application by filing a notice with this Court within seven days of an order of the Wayne Circuit Court denying approval of the settlement agreement. The plaintiffs-appellees’ answer to the application will be due within 21 days after the filing of such notice.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 21, 2021
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carlos Bell v. Civil Service Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlos-bell-v-civil-service-commission-mich-2021.