Carlos Bell v. Civil Service Commission

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 9, 2020
Docket161907
StatusPublished

This text of Carlos Bell v. Civil Service Commission (Carlos Bell v. Civil Service Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carlos Bell v. Civil Service Commission, (Mich. 2020).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 9, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 161907(56) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra CARLOS BELL and All Others Similarly Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Situated, Megan K. Cavanagh, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Justices

SC: 161907 v COA: 347929 Wayne CC: 17-003861-CZ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION and STATE PERSONNEL DIRECTOR, Defendants-Appellants. _________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs-appellees to extend the time for filing their answer is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before October 15, 2020.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 9, 2020 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Carlos Bell v. Civil Service Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlos-bell-v-civil-service-commission-mich-2020.