Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 9, 2010·No. 06-10-00016-CV·Published

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________

No. 06-10-00011-CV ______________________________

IN RE: ENBRIDGE PIPELINES (EAST TEXAS) L.P.

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter MEMORANDUM OPINION

Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas) L.P., Relator, has filed a motion stating that it wishes to

withdraw its petition for writ of mandamus. The relator represents to this Court that the parties

have reached a “compromise and settlement agreement, resolving all issues presently pending

before the Court.” In such a case, no real controversy exists, and in the absence of a controversy,

the appeal is moot.

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1.

Jack Carter Justice

Date Submitted: March 8, 2010 Date Decided: March 9, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ (Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.