Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 9, 2010·No. 06-10-00016-CV·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-10-00011-CV

IN RE:

ENBRIDGE PIPELINES (EAST TEXAS) L.P.

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas) L.P., Relator, has filed a motion stating that it wishes to withdraw its petition for writ of mandamus. The relator represents to this Court that the parties have reached a “compromise and settlement agreement, resolving all issues presently pending before the Court.” In such a case, no real controversy exists, and in the absence of a controversy, the appeal is moot.

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: March 8, 2010 Date Decided: March 9, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ (Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.