Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________
No. 06-10-00011-CV ______________________________
IN RE: ENBRIDGE PIPELINES (EAST TEXAS) L.P.
Original Mandamus Proceeding
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter MEMORANDUM OPINION
Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas) L.P., Relator, has filed a motion stating that it wishes to
withdraw its petition for writ of mandamus. The relator represents to this Court that the parties
have reached a “compromise and settlement agreement, resolving all issues presently pending
before the Court.” In such a case, no real controversy exists, and in the absence of a controversy,
the appeal is moot.
Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.1.
Jack Carter Justice
Date Submitted: March 8, 2010 Date Decided: March 9, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ (Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.