Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ
This text of Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ (Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________
No. 06-10-00011-CV ______________________________
IN RE: ENBRIDGE PIPELINES (EAST TEXAS) L.P.
Original Mandamus Proceeding
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter MEMORANDUM OPINION
Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas) L.P., Relator, has filed a motion stating that it wishes to
withdraw its petition for writ of mandamus. The relator represents to this Court that the parties
have reached a “compromise and settlement agreement, resolving all issues presently pending
before the Court.” In such a case, no real controversy exists, and in the absence of a controversy,
the appeal is moot.
Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.1.
Jack Carter Justice
Date Submitted: March 8, 2010 Date Decided: March 9, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carlos-a-armenta-v-tdcj-texapp-2010.