Carl Eugene Watts v. Harry K. Singletary
102 F.3d 1119, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33143, 1996 WL 730439
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 19, 1996·No. 95-4403·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carl Eugene Watts v. Harry K. Singletary, 102 F.3d 1119, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33143, 1996 WL 730439 (11th Cir. 1996).
102 F.3d 1119 (Carl Eugene Watts v. Harry K. Singletary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carl Eugene Watts v. Harry K. Singletary
102 F.3d 1119 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)