Carl Eugene Watts v. Harry K. Singletary

102 F.3d 1119, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33143, 1996 WL 730439
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 19, 1996·No. 95-4403·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, KRAVITCH, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carl Eugene Watts v. Harry K. Singletary, 102 F.3d 1119, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33143, 1996 WL 730439 (11th Cir. 1996).

102 F.3d 1119 (Carl Eugene Watts v. Harry K. Singletary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carl Eugene Watts v. Harry K. Singletary
102 F.3d 1119 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)