Carl Dorelien v. U.S. Attorney General, John Ashcroft, Immigration and Naturalization Service
317 F.3d 1314, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 431
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 13, 2003·No. 02-13587·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinions
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), hearing En Banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carl Dorelien v. U.S. Attorney General, John Ashcroft, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 317 F.3d 1314, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 431 (11th Cir. 2003).
317 F.3d 1314 (Carl Dorelien v. U.S. Attorney General, John Ashcroft, Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Pelzer
N.D. Alabama, 2025
Eduardo Ariel Gomez v. U.S. Attorney General
Eleventh Circuit, 2019
CHENG KE CHEN v. Holder
783 F. Supp. 2d 1183 (N.D. Alabama, 2011)
Thomas v. George, Hartz, Lundeen, Fulmer, Johnstone, King, & Stevens, P.A.
525 F.3d 1107 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
Marie Jeanne Jean v. Carl Dorelien
431 F.3d 776 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Rashid Sukhera v. U.S. Attorney General
139 F. App'x 153 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Carl Dorelien v. U.S. Attorney General, John Ashcroft, Immigration and Naturalization Service
317 F.3d 1314 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)