Carey v. Wyatt

87 S.E. 770, 17 Ga. App. 517, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 742
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 21, 1916·No. 6512·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, J.

The judge of the city court did not err in vacating and setting aside that portion of the judgment which included attorney’s fees, it appearing undisputed in the record that the statutory notice of intention to include ten per cent, for attorney’s fees, as required by section 4252 of the Civil Code, failed to state the name of the holder of the note; and, this not being an amendable defect, that portion of the judgment was absolutely void and rendered the judgment open to attack, under section 5957 of the Civil Code. Baskins v. Valdosta Bank, 5 Ga. App. 600 (4), 601 (63 S. E. 648); Edenfield v. Bank of Millen, 7 Ga. App. 645 (3), 648 (67 S. E. 896); Gelders v. Kennedy, 9 Ga. App. 389, 390 (71 S. E. 503 ) The proceeding to set aside the judgment was not too late, as it was brought within three years from the rendition of the same. See Civil Code, § 4358. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carey v. Wyatt, 87 S.E. 770, 17 Ga. App. 517, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 742 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

87 S.E. 770 (Carey v. Wyatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Land Development Corp. v. Union Trust Co.
180 S.E. 836 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Burch v. Atlantic Life Insurance
139 S.E. 123 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)