Cardona v. Power
209 N.E.2d 119, 16 N.Y.2d 639, 261 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1333
Opinions
Order affirmed, without costs. (See Matter of Camacho v. Doe, 7 N Y 2d 762.)
Concur: Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Scileppi and Bergan. Chief Judge Desmond dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum in which Judges Fuld and Burke concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cardona v. Power, 209 N.E.2d 119, 16 N.Y.2d 639, 261 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1333 (N.Y. 1965).
209 N.E.2d 119 (Cardona v. Power) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Castro v. State of California
466 P.2d 244 (California Supreme Court, 1970)