Cardona v. Power
209 N.E.2d 119, 16 N.Y.2d 639, 261 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1333
This text of 209 N.E.2d 119 (Cardona v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cardona v. Power, 209 N.E.2d 119, 16 N.Y.2d 639, 261 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1333 (N.Y. 1965).
Opinions
Order affirmed, without costs. (See Matter of Camacho v. Doe, 7 N Y 2d 762.)
Concur: Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Scileppi and Bergan. Chief Judge Desmond dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum in which Judges Fuld and Burke concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Castro v. State of California
466 P.2d 244 (California Supreme Court, 1970)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
209 N.E.2d 119, 16 N.Y.2d 639, 261 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardona-v-power-ny-1965.