Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/CARDENAS-CASANOVA v. Florida Parole Commission

CARDENAS-CASANOVA v. Florida Parole Commission

972 So. 2d 892
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 25, 2007
Docket1D07-0559
StatusPublished

This text of 972 So. 2d 892 (CARDENAS-CASANOVA v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CARDENAS-CASANOVA v. Florida Parole Commission, 972 So. 2d 892 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

972 So.2d 892 (2008)

Felix CARDENAS-CASANOVA, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 1D07-0559.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 25, 2007.
Rehearing Denied January 28, 2008.

*893 Felix Cardenas-Casanova, pro Se, Petitioner.

Kim M. Fluharty, General Counsel, and Connie Lynn Beach, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. Dornau v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 420 So.2d 894 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

BARFIELD, WOLF, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dornau v. FLA. PAROLE & PROB. COMM.
420 So. 2d 894 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Cardenas-Casanova v. Florida Parole Commission
972 So. 2d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
972 So. 2d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cardenas-casanova-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2007.