Carbonelli v. Bremer

186 Misc. 348, 60 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1926
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 7, 1946·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

On its face the petition is insufficient to sustain the summary proceeding. Although, as stated, the certificate authorized the landlord to maintain the proceeding so that she may occupy the apartment as her dwelling, there is no allegation in the petition that any such occupancy is desired; none of the exceptions to subdivision (a) of section 6 of the Rent Regulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Rental Area (8 Federal Register 13914, 13917) is pleaded; and the certificate is manifestly insufficient to confer jurisdiction. (Shelton Management Corp. v. Rosenkrantz, 184 Misc. 355; Gilroy v. Becker, 186 Misc. 93.)

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed, with costs.

Hammer, ¡Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carbonelli v. Bremer, 186 Misc. 348, 60 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

186 Misc. 348 (Carbonelli v. Bremer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Giannini v. Stuart
6 A.D.2d 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
949-957 Park Avenue Corp. v. Hansen
189 Misc. 422 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)